|
"a
rather wonderful new book ... [describes] the requirements for real
- or 'categorical' - apology.
It is
the best working model for a 'proper sorry' that anyone has yet come
up with."
Management
Today
Apology Advising
In 2008 I
published
I Was Wrong: The Meanings of Apologies with Cambridge
University Press. I Was Wrong provides a nuanced framework
for the ethical meanings of apologies from individuals and
collectives, considering along the way the historical and cultural
traditions that inform modern acts of contrition. I have been very
fortunate to discuss I Was Wrong on NPR (an hour-long
interview with Diane Rehm), CNN, BBC, CBC, Philosophy Talk, and
various other national and international programs.
Click here for links to these interviews.
I am currently
working on the follow-up book, tentatively titled Apologies in
Law and also under contract with Cambridge University Press.
Apologies in Law will apply the framework for the ethical
meanings of apologies from I Was Wrong to acts of contrition
in civil and criminal law.
In conjunction with my
academic writings on apologies, I serve as an "apology advisor" or
"apology consultant" to various individuals and groups.
How Can I Help?
Apologies can be immensely
complex and powerful social interactions, and our personal and
professional relationships may hinge on the quality of
our apologies. Whether a petty insult poisons family dynamics for generations, an era of
oppression haunts a nation, or a poor decision damages an
organization's reputation, what I describe as a categorical apology
can often serve as the most effective means of cleaning and
stitching such wounds. As we see repeatedly with public figures, bad
apologies can make matters considerably worse and contribute to
perceptions that the apologizer lacks integrity.
My analysis of Eliot Spitzer's March 2008 apology explains some
of these issues.
My research identifies
hundreds of ways in which apologies succeed or fail. When an
individual or organization considers apologizing, I can serve as a
guide through the many nuances of apologetic meaning. This may
entail providing assistance as the apologizer drafts the language of
an apology, warning against common errors that cause apologies to
appear disingenuous or otherwise render them ineffective, or
explaining the potential legal, political, economic, or personal
consequences of certain kinds of apologies. There are no simple
formulas for meaningful apologies, and I can work with parties to
determine how I might be most useful.
What Specifically Can I
Do?
No
two injuries are the same, and the need for apologies arises in many
different contexts. My role will vary depending on the
particularities of the context, but the following provides a sample
of the sorts of assistance I can provide:
-I can interview the person seeking to apologize, learning her
perspective on the events and what she hopes to
accomplish with an apology.
-I can interview the offended parties to learn their perspective on
the events and what they would like an apology
from the offender to accomplish.
-I can explain the sorts of apologetic meaning that may be most
significant given the nature of the offense, the
desires of the parties, and the cultural context. This is often the
most important step, as this discussion may
causes parties to fundamentally rethink the objectives of their
apology.
-I can assist parties in drafting their apologies and navigating the
morally, politically, and legally charged language
of contrition.
-I can review drafts of apologies and indicate weaknesses,
ambiguities, and areas that might be refined..
-An meaningful apology consists of much more than the words spoken -
in many cases the oral delivery is one of
the least significant elements of an apology - and I can comment on
the various non-verbal aspects within the
process of expressing contrition in particular contexts.
-As a J.D./Ph.D. who clerked for the U.S. Court of Appeals, worked
as a litigator for a major law firm, and is
completing a book on the role of apologies in law, I can consult
with attorneys regarding the consequences of
various kinds of apologies in civil and criminal matters.
-For those who seek apologies or have received apologies, I can
interpret the meanings of the apology and
explain what an apology does and does not convey. If an apology is
calibrated to avoid accepting blame or to
avoid legal consequences and providing redress, I can detect this.
If you have received an apology as an element
of a settlement, I can determine if the apology conveys the meanings
you seek.
-As an experienced professor who has received several teaching
awards, I offer lectures, seminars, and longer
courses on various aspects of apologizing. I can tailor these
sessions to the needs of the group, for example
speaking to judges regarding apologies and sentencing, leading a
seminar for attorneys regarding the role of
apologies in settlement negotiations, or teaching a short course for
diplomats or public relations firms regarding
the difficulties associated with collective apologies such as those
from corporations or governments.
I
am available via email, phone, videoconference, or teleconference,
and when prudent I will travel to the relevant destinations.
I
appreciate that these issues are often time-sensitive and I am
accustomed to working in crisis management environments where I must
provide written or oral advice quickly and with little notice.
What I Don't Do.
For various reasons
explained in I Was Wrong, I am not a spokesperson who
apologizes for
clients. I do not provide legal services.
Why Do I Offer These
Services?
For
various cultural reasons, many of our public and private
conversations about our shared values now occur in the context of
someone apologizing or demanding an apology. As a professional moral
philosopher who has dedicated much of my career to studying
apologies, I find thoughtful apologies essential for the health of
our pluralistic society. Effective apologies can transform
international relations or save marriages. Ineffective apologies can
destroy careers and lives. Although I appreciate the difficulty of
their task, it pains me to see public figures botch apologies and
squander the opportunity to enrich our discussions about our
collective values. Applying my research in these ways is immensely
gratifying, and the proceeds fund my children's education.
Fees.
My fees vary depending
on my role and the organization I am assisting. Corporate executives,
public figures, and similar entities typically pay rates commensurate
with fees charged by top national law firms. Whenever possible I
take on pro bono cases for matters in the public interest.
Contact.
Email me at
nick.smith@unh.edu to
discuss potential matters. All correspondence is confidential. |