INTERNATIONAL DATING VIOLENCE STUDY
* * * NEWSLETTER 10 * * * *
ADMINISTRATION
OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE AT MORE THAN UNIVERSITY
This can have two advantages: (1) It increases the sample size. (2) It enables you to make comparisons
between universities when it is meaningful to do so, as for example when they
represent difference language groups or regions.
If
you do this, use the space on the answer sheet for question 300 to indicate the
sites where you administered the questionnaire. For example, if you tested at three universities, mark all the
answer sheets from students at the university as a 1 in question 300, mark all
the answer sheets from students at the second university as 2 in question 300,
and all the answer sheets from students at the second university as 3 in
question 300. When you send me the
answer sheets let me know the name of university 1, the name of university 2,
and the name of university 3. This will
permit me to enter those names into the computer file that I send you.
DATING IN ARRANGED-MARRIAGE
SOCIETIES
I
have been corresponding with consortium members from countries where marriages
are arranged by parents and therefore, presumable, there is no dating. However, my experience in India and Sri
Lanka, makes me guess that a number of students will have friends of the
opposite sex with whom they spend time because of mutual attraction. Thus, at least some students date in the
sense that they find ways of spending time together, but may do so
privately. I am not sure about this
because it was not an issue that I studied when I was teaching in those
countries.
This
memo deals with that situation by first defining dating and then making
suggestions based on that definition.
DEFINITION
OF DATING For purposes of the IDV study “dating” is defined as a dyadic
relationship involving meeting for social interaction and joint activities and
an explicit or implicit intention to continue the relationship until one or the
other party terminates or until some other more committed relationship is
established such as cohabiting, engagement, or marriage.
The concept of “dating” as it is
known in the USA is foreign to many cultures and the social norms for dating,
and actual dating behavior, differ according to many dimensions, including
individual differences, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic group differences,
historical era, and cultural context.
In the American cultural context, dating implies individual choice of partners,
but that is not an essential part of the phenomenon being address in this
study.
Despite these differences, there are
also some inherent structural similarities; for example, it is a dyadic
relationship and the parties usually invest time and energy. Therefore social interactional process
typical of dyads are likely to apply regardless of whether the relationship was
arranged by parents or friends, by newspaper or by internet, or by one party
personally initiating the development of a relationship. Further, if the relationship continues
beyond the initial date, it implies the possibility of mutual attraction, ego
involvement, and the possibility of becoming a more committed type of pair
relationship. Thus, the principles of
theories such as exchange theory and conflict theory could apply to these types
of relationships (whatever, they are named) in the cultural contexts to be
studied.
Evidence indicating that at least
some characteristics apply cross-nationally comes from a study of
undergraduates in North Carolina and at the National Taiwan University (Lin Yuan-Huei & Rusbult, 1995).
They found that in both countries, students were more committed to their
partners when they were satisfied with the relationship and if they perceived a
high degree of investment in the relationship.
They concluded that the same basic processes were involved in changing
to a more committed type of relationship.
CULTURALLY
MEANINGFUL QUESTIONNAIRE EXPLANATION. I
suggest that this issue be dealt with by first conducting exploratory conversations
with a few students to understand their views and perceptions of relationships
between male and female students. You
can use this information as part of the basis for writing a brief paragraph for
the cover page of the questionnaire explaining the kind of relationships you
would like them to describe. The
paragraph might include in as part of the explanation "a friend from the
opposite sex that that you spend a lot of time with on/off campus” and could
say that the relationship it does not necessarily involve a physical (i.e.,
sexual) relationship.
PROPORTION OF STUDENTS ARE IN A
RELATIONSHIP. An interesting and
important issue that you will be able to investigate is the proportion of
students in a dating relationship at your site or sites. That is, one of the interesting results of
the study will be how many report being in such a relationship. For some groups there may not be any who
admit to dating (or whatever term or phase you decide on). That would be a finding of the study! Of course, it will also depend on how you
explain the kind of relationship that has to be present in order for them to
answer about a dating relationship.
BRIEF
“DATING DESCRIPTION” QUESTIONNAIRE. The
above discussion suggests that a valuable addition to the study would be to get
a better picture of what dating is for students at your site by asking students
to complete a one-page questionnaire that you can the Dating Description
Questionnaire. This would take about ten
minutes and would ask a series of open-ended questions about their relationship
with the person of the opposite sex with whom they spend the most time.
QUESTIONS
FOR THE DATING DESCRIPTION QUESTIONNAIRE.
The questions could include the following:
Where
do you spend time together?
How
much time they spend together in a typical week?
Do
you feel romantically attracted to this person?
If
you are romantically attracted, how strong is the attraction?
Have
you thought of the possibility of marrying this person?
ADMINISTRATION OF THE DATING DESCRIPTION QUESTIONNAIRE. Because this questionnaire will probably take only about 10 minutes, it could given just before the main IDV study questionnaire, provided the class period is longer than the 50 minutes it takes to complete the standard questionnaire. If only a 50-minute class period is available, then the Dating Description Questionnaire can be done on a day before the IDV study questionnaire. The only disadvantage to giving it separately is that there will not be a practical way to link the one-page questionnaire with the IDV study questionnaire, but it is not crucial to link them.
If
the Dating Description Questionnaire is administered at the same time as the
IDV study questionnaire, the two can be linked by marking the Dating
Description Questionnaire with the number that is on the Answer Sheet, and
distributing them together.
USE
LOCALLY SALIENT QUESTIONS TO DESCRIBE DATING.
If you have not already committed
to using these final questions for another purpose, they could be used to ask
questions describing a dating relationship similar to those listed above. However, the questions have to be written in
a way that lets the students respond by marking an answer number. In the case of a question such as “Where do
you spend time together?” the question
can permit a respondent to “mark all that apply.”