Notes and reminders


Memory (outline, notes of 10/14/98, links)

Memory bears a fundamental relationship to most other behavior -- learning, intelligence, thought, social relationships, etc.

Demonstrations

Familiar object (e.g. penny memory)

See the exhibit on memory at the Exploratorium in San Francisco.
http://www.exploratorium.edu/memory/index.html

Serial position curve

Primacy and recency effects

False memory

Confabulation of "sleep" amongst sleep words, recovered memory, effects of questions on eyewitness testimony, (Elizabeth Loftus' paper)

Memory distortion due to schema and encoding failure

Bartlett's (1932) Remembering studies

(mnemonics)

See Yates, F. A. (1966). The art of memory. London, Routledge and K. Paul. For the history of mnemonics)
Still a useful "mind-tool?" (Mind tools are cultural innovations that extend the power of our mind. We are not born with these though we are probably adapted to using them and even evolved in concert with some of them like language.)
Check this "mind tool" site:
http://www.psychwww.com/mtsite/
Verbal acronyms, method of loci, peg-words and imagery are common mnemonics. For details see:
http://www.psychwww.com/mtsite/memory.html

Other useful techniques

Spaced practice, overlearning, increased elaboration with rich interconnections of ideas, hierarchical organization of ideas

Stage model

See Glietman, p.247 Fig. 7.1
http://web.wwnorton.com/norton/figures/fig0701.gif

Working memory instead of STM

Encoding info into LTM requires an active process; mere exposure is not enough e.g. Nickerson & Adams penny study)
Encoding depends on situation and existing memories

The magic number 7 and recoding into "chunks"

Organization of LTM

Implicit (procedural)

Memory for doing is not as much affected by hippocampal lesions

Explicit (declarative)

Semantic or episodic?

Episodic memory most affected by hippocampal lesions

Retrieval

Recall or recognition?

While recognition (as in a multiple choice exam) is often seen as "easier" than recall, it really depends on how close the alternatives are.

Cues, priming, depth of processing

Familiarity (sensitivity to prior exposure) helpful but may be trouble! See below.

Failures in memory

Interference

e.g. "Tip of the tongue" phenomena

repression

deliberate forgetting may be possible but difficult -- clinical dissociation? See Freud section in Gleitman.

Amnesia (contrast with déjà vu")

Retrograde

Prior info lost or unretrievable?

Present

Patients may retain semantic memory (language skills, some basic knowledge of life) but be fixed in the present- - current hour or so.

Anterograde (video)

No new memories?
No new "declarative" (language, propositional) info?
Maybe new "procedural" (skill, implicit knowledge) memory? This requires indirect assessment of memory, e.g. forced choice procedures.

Childhood "amnesia"

There's an entire genre of research on autobiographical memory. Cf. "flashbulb memories"

brain and memory

The search for the "engram" -- where are new memories embodied? (video)
Hippocampus and other critical structures
Most obvious in the case of HM and others with similar hippocampal damage.
Alzheimer's and other degenerative diseases
Aging and memory loss
Prosopagnosia

Confabulation

The Human tendency to want to tell a good story often and unconsciously fabricates a memory in the process if needed.

Reconstruction biases

The role of schemas, "scripts", and "top-down" influences on memories.

False recovered memories

E. Loftus' work on implanted memories.

Effects of familiarity

Déjà vu, familiarity and fame, p.261. In all of these it appears the mind confabulates a lot based upon no more than feelings of familiarity triggered by the situation.