CONVERSATIONAL ANALYSIS (CA)
- The study of how an utterance does its 'work'
- What it does in the conversation
- Conversation Analysis (CA) pays attention to the sequential position of utterances
- For each speaker reveals in their 'turn' what they took a previous speaker to be saying
- The major units of CA are:
- "adjacency pairs" (often with a "presequence")
- "preference structures" (with preferred and dispreferred parts)..
- Central concept: "adjacency pair"
- Works in terms of sequential expectations and commitments
- As one speaker projects or formulates a situation, another feels required to do something in response
- A "first-pair part" (FPP) sets up a "conditional relevance" which is (or can be) satisfied by the "second-pair part"
(SPP):
- Here are some types of adjacency pairs that have been extensively studied:
- assertion-assent/dissent; question-answer; summons-answer; greeting- greeting; apology-acceptance/refusal;
compliment-acceptance/rejection; threat-response; challenge-response; accusation-denial/confession; telling-
assessment (good, awful, interesting, discouraging, etc.); boasting-appreciation/derision.
- This is how certain 'answers' with a very strange surface structures can be perfectly well understood.
- "What is 'said' is obscure; what is 'meant' is obvious and clear":
- line 12 A: Who can see whom? ('question')
- line 13 B: The man the boy. (must be an'answer')
- Many important meanings are revealed in our pauses, emphases, intakes of breath, intonation, etc., in our utterances.
- Notation (Gail Jefferson)
- Adjacency pairs (Slide 1) involve:
- (i) sometimes a presequence, (pre-offers, pre-announcements)
- (ii) but always a preference structure - a certain kind of response is expected or preferred
- Presequences (pre-requests, pre-announcements):
- Slide 2
- Is the occasion right?
- Will the utterance fit?
- Preference structures
- Slide 3
- Preferred response - simple
- Dis-preferred response - very complex
- Insertion sequences
- Slide 4
- 'Tactic' for 'checking out'
- Can be used to hold off proper completion until an appropriate moment
- Complex 'chinese box' structure
- Updating:
- Occasioning:
- Contrast structures:
- The making of a positive statement was made contingent upon certain conditions and contrasts
- A: If [they're willing to get on and be like us] then [I'm not anti them] but...
- if [they're just going...to use our social welfares] then [why don't they stay home]
- Contrast structures are very important: a 'descriptive statement' is preceded by an 'instruction' as to how the behavior is
contrasting,
- "a) She was terrified of men getting close to her, and yet, b) she continually told us about all the men who where
interested in her."
- Contrasts and differences: language works in terms of differences which normally are never made explicit; by making
the contrast explicit, the fact that abnormal circumstances are meant.
- Extreme case formulations:
- ..[if] they are just going to come here, just to be able to use our social welfares and stuff like that, [then]..."
- Disclaimers: an attempt to PREEMPT negative interpretations.
- "I'm not racist, but... I think these people would be happier back home."
- If you then still go ahead and say: "I think that that is a very racialist attitude to take." They could say in an
aggrieved tone: "But I said I'm not a racialist."