CMN457: Introduction to Interpersonal Communication
Spring 2003, Professor John Shotter
REVISION HINTS FOR SECOND EXAM
[The exam will cover material from: #8 (Schegloff); #9 (Notes - Shotter); Tannen ch.1, ch.2, ch.3, ch.4, ch.5, ch.6, ch.7, ch.8, ch.10; #11 (Krippendorff); #13 (Scheff)
‒ What, classically, have been the four central concerns in the study of communication?
‒ Schegloff focuses both on what is done in our utterances, and what is done by an utterance being absent.
‒ He has three premises for his own approach: what are they?
‒ What is the difference between conversation and discourse?
‒ To whom do we give “news”? Why do we first check out whether the person already has the news or not?
‒ What is the ‘preferred’ response to an offer, or pre-offer, of information?
‒ Whose ‘units of action’ matter in Conversational Analysis (CA)?
‒ Silences are not ‘nothings’.
‒ What is an “adjacency pair” (give examples)?
‒ “Conditional relevance”?
‒ “Preference structure”?
‒ “Pre-sequence,” “insertion sequence,” and “occasioning”?
‒ Why does the giving of a dis-preferred response often give rise to a more complicated exchange than the giving of a preferred response?
‒ What are the reasons for people often communicating indirectly?
‒ What are the main dimensions of difference that define people’s different conversational styles?
‒ What conflicting needs are we continually trying to balance in our communicating?
‒ Why can we often not communicate directly even if we want to?
‒ Look up framing and re-framing.
‒ Study the special nature of intimate relationships.
‒ What features of our utterance most often convey metamessages?
‒ Grice’s Cooperative Principle
‒ Lakoff’s Logic of Politeness.
‒ Feelings versus Content
‒ Saying versus Showing... what is said versus the saying of it.
‒ Complimentary schisogenesis.
‒ Bateson and metamessages
‒ Tannen’s claimed differences between mean and women
‒ Look into the properties of communication as a continuous stream of actions.
‒ Krippendorff and the power of words in shaping our perceptions.
‒ What are the taken-for-granted assumptions that prevent us from noticing the power of language in our seeing.
‒ What are K’s four conclusions?
‒ Does Scheff see power as lying in offers or responses?
‒ What does Scheff mean by the ‘format’ of a negotiation?
‒ Why is consciousness of the process of negotiation?
All the course notes are on my web-site: http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jds