CMN457: Introduction to Interpersonal Communication

Spring 2003, Professor John Shotter



REVISION HINTS FOR SECOND EXAM


[The exam will cover material from: #8 (Schegloff); #9 (Notes - Shotter); Tannen ch.1, ch.2, ch.3, ch.4, ch.5, ch.6, ch.7, ch.8, ch.10; #11 (Krippendorff); #13 (Scheff)



 

            What, classically, have been the four central concerns in the study of communication?

            Schegloff focuses both on what is done in our utterances, and what is done by an utterance being absent.

            He has three premises for his own approach: what are they?

            What is the difference between conversation and discourse?

            To whom do we give “news”? Why do we first check out whether the person already has the news or not?

            What is the ‘preferred’ response to an offer, or pre-offer, of information?

            Whose ‘units of action’ matter in Conversational Analysis (CA)?

            Silences are not ‘nothings’.

            What is an “adjacency pair” (give examples)?

            “Conditional relevance”?

            “Preference structure”?

            “Pre-sequence,” “insertion sequence,” and “occasioning”?

            Why does the giving of a dis-preferred response often give rise to a more complicated exchange than the giving of a preferred response?

            What are the reasons for people often communicating indirectly?

            What are the main dimensions of difference that define people’s different conversational styles?

            What conflicting needs are we continually trying to balance in our communicating?

            Why can we often not communicate directly even if we want to?

            Look up framing and re-framing.

            Study the special nature of intimate relationships.

            What features of our utterance most often convey metamessages?

            Grice’s Cooperative Principle

            Lakoff’s Logic of Politeness.

            Feelings versus Content

            Saying versus Showing... what is said versus the saying of it.

            Complimentary schisogenesis.

            Bateson and metamessages

            Tannen’s claimed differences between mean and women

            Look into the properties of communication as a continuous stream of actions.

            Krippendorff and the power of words in shaping our perceptions.

            What are the taken-for-granted assumptions that prevent us from noticing the power of language in our seeing.

            What are K’s four conclusions?

            Does Scheff see power as lying in offers or responses?

            What does Scheff mean by the ‘format’ of a negotiation?

            Why is consciousness of the process of negotiation?




All the course notes are on my web-site: http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jds