Abstract: Unlike past American wars, the current war on terror has not been associated with a centrally proffered narrative providing some guidance and orientation for those administering government services under state-of-war conditions. War is as much a cultural endeavor as it is a military undertaking, and the absence of a clear sensemaking narrative was detected in this study of public administrators from three agencies with varying proximity to the conflict. Q-methodology was used to explore the way individuals processed the war narratives put forth by the Bush administration and reported in the media immediately following the September 11 attacks. Though no distinct state-of-war narratives were found among the public administrators in this study, there are clear indications that latent narratives reflecting local political and organizational task environments have emerged.

This download is password protected due to copyright. Please write to co-author Dubnick (email on main/contact page) for permission to access this copy.

Cite as: Kathe Callahan, Melvin J. Dubnick and Dorothy Olshfski, "War Narratives: Framing Our Understanding of the War on Terror," PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW , 66:4 (July/August 2006): 554-568.

Click here for pdf copy of
September 2004 ms draft (no password required)

(authors listed in alphabetical order)

Kathe Callahan
Graduate Department of Public Administration
Rutgers University-Campus at Newark

***

Melvin J. Dubnick
Department of Political Science
University of New Hampshire
***

Dorothy Olshfski
Graduate Department of Public Administration
Rutgers University-Campus at Newark