To appear in Murray A. Straus, The Primordial Violence:  Corporal Punishment By Parents,

Cognitive Development, And Crime, Walnut Creek, CA:  Alta Mira press, In Press.

 

 

Chapter 14

 

DEMYSTIFYING THE DEFENSES OF

CORPORAL PUNISHMENT *

 

Murray A. Straus

Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire

Durham, NH 03824  603-862-2594   murray.straus@unh.edu 

 

Contents

 

A. DEFENSES BASED ON THE PRESUMED GREATER EFFICACY OF CP. 3

A1.  If My Dad Hadn't Taken Me Over His Knee, I Would Be In Big Trouble Now. 3

A2.  Spanking Is Needed As A Back-Up Or Last Resort 3

A3.  The "Eight Strongest Studies" Demonstrate "Beneficial Outcomes" Of CP. 4

A4.  "Authoritative" Parents Use CP And Their Children Have The Best Outcomes. 5

A5.  Parents Spank In Countries Such As Japan That Have Low Crime Rates. 5

 

B.  DEFENSES BASED ON THE BELIEF THAT SPANKING "IN MODERATION" BY LOVING PARENTS IS NOT HARMFUL  5

B1.  I Was Spanked and I'm OK. 5

B2.  If CP Makes Things Worse, Why Does Misbehavior Decrease As Children Grow Older?. 6

 

C.  DEFENSES BASED ON PROBLEMS PRESUMED TO RESULT FROM LESS USE OF CP. 6

C1.  Since CP Has Been Abolished In Schools, Discipline Has Declined And School Violence Is Up. 6

C2.  Crime By Youth Is Up Because Parents Are Not Spanking. 6

C3.  No-Spanking Means No Discipline And Children Running Wild. 7

 

d. DEFENSES BASED ON PRESUMED IMPRACTICALITY OF ENDING CP. 7

D1.  Low Education Parents Lack the Cognitive And Linguistic Skills Needed To Avoid CP. 7

D2.  Spanking Is Necessary Because Toddlers Don’t Understand Explanations And Reasoning. 8

D3. “Never Spank” Is A Negative Approach And Won’t Work.  It Is Better To Use A Positive Approach And Teach Alternatives. 8

D4  Spanking Is Universal And Can't Be Dealt With By Policies Or Laws. 9

 

E  DEFENSES BASED ON THE IDEA THAT SPANKING IS NOT THE REAL PROBLEM.. 9

E1.  The Real Problem Is Bad Parenting. 9

E2.  The Important Issue Is The Overall Pattern Of Parent Behavior 9

E 3. The Link Between Spanking And Mental Health Problems Is Genetic. 10

E 4  Overlap Of Corporal Punishment And Physical Abuse. 10

 

F.  CULTURAL RELATIVISM DEFENSES. 10

F1.  CP Is Not Harmful If It Is Perceived As A Legitimate Exercise Of Parental Authority. 10

F2.  CP Is Appropriate In The Context Of African American Culture And Life Circumstance. 11

 

G.  STATISTICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL DEFENSES. 11

G1.  Spanking Is A Response To Misbehavior Rather Than A Cause Of Misbehavior 11

G2.   CP By Itself Has Only A Small Effect And Is Not Worth Worrying About 11

G3  There Is No Evidence That “Moderate” CP, Used Only Rarely, Has Harmful Effects. 12

G4. We Should Wait For More Conclusive Research Before Advising Parents To Never- Spank. 12

G5.  If All Children Are Spanked, It Is A Constant and Cannot Explain Anything. 12

G6  Inadequate Controls For Other Variables. 12

G8  The Effect Size Is Too Small To Make A Difference. 13

G9 Even Prospective Research Does Not Prove A Causal Relation. 14

G10  The Results May Be Due To Recall Bias. 14

 

H.  OTHER DEFENSES. 14

H1  The Bible Tells Parents To Spank. 14

H2  We Should Focus on More Important And Crucial Threats To Children Such As Poverty And Racism   14

 

 

 


            The preceding chapters make clear that public opinion and an increasing number of parents have shifted away from corporal punishment (CP).   As a result, those who conti